Women Farmers Toil to Expand Africa's Food Supply

By Megan Rowling Tags: Bill Gates Foundation, Africa, women farmers, irrigation, technology, U.N. World Food Programme, underserved peoples, education, FAO, fertilizer, paulownia, agroforestry

LONDON, Dec 26 - Like many African women, Mazoe Gondwe is her family's main food provider. Lately, she has struggled to farm her plot in Malawi due to unpredictable rains that are making her hard life even tougher.

"Now we can't just depend on rain-fed agriculture, so we plant two crops - one watered with rain and one that needs irrigating," she explained. "But irrigation is back-breaking and can take four hours a day."

Gondwe, flown by development agency ActionAid to U.N. climate change talks in Poland this month, said she wanted access to technology that would cut the time it takes to water her crops and till her farm garden. She would also be glad of help to improve storage facilities and seed varieties.

"As a local farmer, I know what I need and I know what works. I grew up in the area and I know how the system is changing," Gondwe said.

This year, agricultural experts have renewed calls for policy makers to pay more attention to small-scale women farmers such as Gondwe, who grow up to 80 percent of crops for food consumption in Africa.

After decades in the political wilderness, farming became a hot topic this year when international food prices hit record highs in June, sharply boosting hunger around the world. The proportion of development aid spent on agriculture has dropped to just 4 percent from a peak of 17 percent in 1982.

Former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has called for women to be at the heart of a "policy revolution" to boost small-scale farming in Africa.

Women have traditionally shouldered the burden of household food production both there and in Asia, while men tend to focus on growing cash crops or migrate to cities to find paid work.

Yet women own a tiny percentage of the world's land -- some experts say as little as 2 percent -- and receive only around 5 percent of farming information services and training.

"Today the African farmer is the only farmer who takes all the risks herself: no capital, no insurance, no price supports, and little help - if any - from governments. These women are tough and daring and resilient, but they need help," Annan told an October conference on fighting hunger.

A new toolkit explaining how to tackle gender issues in farming development projects, published by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), highlights the potential returns of improving women's access to technology, land and finance.

In Ghana, for example, if women and men had equal land rights and security of tenure, women's use of fertilizer and profits per hectare would nearly double.

In Burkina Faso, Kenya and Tanzania, giving women entrepreneurs the same inputs and education as men would boost business revenue by up to 20 percent. And in Ivory Coast, raising women's income by $10 brings improvements in children's health and nutrition that would require a $110 increase in men's income.

"The knowledge is there, the know-how is there, but the world -- and here I'm talking rich and poor -- doesn't apply it as much as it could," said Marcela Villarreal, director of FAO's gender, equity and rural employment division.

EQUALITY

Many African governments have introduced formal laws making women and men equal, but have troubling enforcing them where they clash with customary laws giving property ownership rights to men, she said.

Often if a woman's husband dies, she has little choice but to marry one of his relatives so she can keep farming her plot and feeding her children, Villarreal said. But if a widow is HIV positive, she might be chased off her land.

In Malawi, FAO is working with parliamentarians and village chiefs to let rural women know they are legally able to hold land titles. They are given wind-up radios so they can listen to farming shows in local languages and taught how to write a will.

"People continue to think that doing things for women is part of a welfare programme and doing things for men - big investments or credit - that is agriculture, that is GDP-related," Villarreal said.

"Women continue not to be seen as part of the productive potential of a country."

One powerful woman trying to change that is Agnes Kalibata, Rwanda's minister of state for agriculture. She said government land reform and credit programmes specifically target struggling women farmers - many of whom are bringing up children alone after their husbands were killed in the 1994 genocide.

This has helped raise their incomes, leading to better nutrition, health and education for their children, Kalibata said. Women are also getting micro-credit loans, which they use to access markets and cooperatives or set up small businesses, such as producing specialty coffee for export.

"They are not like rocket scientists, they are women from the general population who finally feel empowered that they can come out and do some of these things," explained Kalibata.

In the private sector, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have decided to put women at the centre of its agricultural development programme by attaching conditions to grants. It no longer finances projects that ignore gender issues, and it requires women to be involved in their design and implementation.

Catherine Bertini, a senior fellow at the foundation and professor of public administration at Syracuse University, said aid donors had not spent enough on support for women farmers.

"You can find the rhetoric but it's a limited number of people who actually walk the walk," she said.

Bertini, who headed the U.N. World Food Programme in the 1990s, said policy makers could best be persuaded to focus on women farmers by playing up the economic benefits rather than talking about gender equality.

"You convince people to do it because it's the most practical way to increase productivity and income to women," she said.

Powered by Qumana

The World After 2020

Tags: global warming, deforestationMBendi Newsletter: 28.Nov.2008

In our last newsletter, we commented on the energy implications of the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook 2008. The outlook also had much to say about the likely environmental impact of their reference scenario, so I dug through our Signposts for the past three months to see what new evidence there is for climate change. Here's a summary of what I found.

First some new forecasts to set the scene. Ice sheets on Antarctica and Greenland would raise world sea levels by about 70 meters if they melted completely. Fortunately, the UN Climate Panel projects that sea levels will only rise by between 18 and 59 cm this century. Scientists in Japan forecast that peatlands, concentrated in high latitude locations including Canada, Russia and Alaska, could experience a 40% carbon loss from shallow peat and 86% carbon loss from deep peat with a warming of four degrees C.

The IEA reference scenario forecasts that world greenhouse gas emissions, including non-energy CO2 and all other gases, will grow 35% between 2005 and 2030, leading to a doubling in the concentration of those gases in the atmosphere by the end of this century and an eventual global average temperature increase of up to 6°C on today. Separately, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography warned that the earth will warm about 2.4° C above pre-industrial levels even under extremely conservative greenhouse-gas emission scenarios and under the assumption that efforts to clean up particulate pollution continue to be successful.

So, where are we right now? Starting with the atmosphere above us, the UN Climate Change Secretariat reported that emissions by 40 industrialized nations dropped 0.1% from 2005 to 2006 driven by a fall in U.S. emissions. However, 2006 emissions of 18.0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide were still 2.3% up from 17.6 billion in 2000 and only 4.7% down from 1990 levels of 18.9 billion tonnes. Most of this drop is due to the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, whose emissions have risen 7.4% to 3.7 billion tonnes just since 2000.

The Global Carbon Project reported anthropogenic CO2 emissions have been growing about four times faster since 2000 than during the previous decade. Worldwide man-made emissions of CO2 increased 3% in 2007. The annual mean growth rate of atmospheric CO2 was 2.2 ppm per year in 2007, above the 2.0 ppm average for the period 2000-2007 and 50% above the average annual mean growth rate for the previous 20 years of 1.5 ppm. Atmospheric CO2 concentration was 383 ppm in 2007, 37% above the concentration at the start of the industrial revolution and the highest during the last 650,000 years and probably during the last 20 million years. Natural land and ocean CO2 sinks removed 54% of all CO2 emitted from human activities during the period 2000-2007.

In 2006, China passed the USA, still the leader in emissions per-capita, to become the largest CO2 emitter, and India will soon overtake Russia to become the third largest emitter. More than half of the global emissions come from less developed countries. However, developing countries with 80% of the world's population still account for only 20% of the cumulative emissions since 1751; the poorest countries in the world, with 800 million people, have contributed less than 1% of these cumulative emissions. Japan reported 2007 emissions were at record levels due to closure of a nuclear power plant.

An MIT report in Geophysical Research Letters indicated that levels of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide, rose abruptly in Earth's atmosphere in 2007. Methane has more than doubled in the atmosphere since pre-industrial times, but stayed largely stable over the last decade or so before rising in 2007 simultaneously at all the places scientists measured around the globe.

Moving from the air to the oceans, an Australian study showed rising carbon dioxide levels in the world's oceans due to climate change, combined with rising sea temperatures, could accelerate coral bleaching, destroying some reefs before 2050. Scientists reported that the number of polluted "dead zones" areas of oxygen-starved water in the world's oceans is growing at about 5% per annum and coastal fish stocks are more vulnerable to collapse than previously feared. According to the Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies in Spain marine organisms are more vulnerable to low oxygen content than currently recognized, with fish and crustaceans being the most vulnerable.

The Center for Australian Weather and Climate Research reported in Nature Geoscience that the Southern Ocean, the world's largest carbon sink, has maintained its ability to soak up excess carbon despite changes to currents and wind speeds. The ocean was becoming warmer and less saline. Currents had not changed in strength, though they had shifted closer to Antarctica. CO2 is absorbed by the ocean's turbulent surface layer and then carried to the depths by circulation patterns. It is also absorbed by phytoplankton and other organisms, which fall to the ocean bottom when they die. Some of the carbon-rich water from the depths rises near Antarctica, releasing CO2, while further away from the continent, it sinks again because it is less dense. Overall the ocean absorbs much more than it releases.

Scientists calculated temperatures had risen about 2 Celsius in the past 40 years in the Arctic and by a few tenths of a degree in Antarctica, where some winter sea ice has even expanded in recent decades. The University of Colorado's National Snow and Ice Data Center reported that Arctic sea ice melted to its second-lowest level in the summer of 2008, 34% percent below the average from 1979 to 2000, but 9% above the record low set in 2007, the warmest year on record in the Arctic. The annual report of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration concluded that autumn air temperatures in the Arctic had climbed to a record 5 degrees C due to major losses of sea ice caused by a warming trend dating back decades. Wild reindeer and caribou herds appear to be declining in numbers. Surface ice is also melting in Greenland.

However, in line with the adage that every dark cloud has a silver lining, the UN Environment Programme reported that a 3 km thick cloud of pollutants hanging over Asia may be delaying the worst effects of global warming. And the Earth Policy Institute published figures showing that while the number of cars and bicycles manufactured during the 1950's and 1960's was almost the same, nearly three times as many bicycles were manufactured as cars in 2007 and bicycle sales continue to rise even while car sales plummet.

I recently read John Firor's The Changing Atmosphere, which succinctly describes the phenomena of acid rain, stratospheric ozone and climate heating. Long before the end, one feels he is describing a situation that calls for immediate action - I was horrified to find the book was researched and published all of twenty years ago and, apart from getting rid of CFCs, we haven't made a lot of progress since then. However, we're heartened that the new US government plans to comprehend the environment in its proposed economic rescue package. They could well take a leaf out of the book of Portugal, which aims to have 60% of electric power provided by solar, wind, wave and other clean sources by 2020 and which last week signed an agreement with Renault and Nissan to create a national network for zero-emission cars by the end of 2011. Now that's what Detroit should be proposing to Congress is exchange for a bail-out...

Powered by Qumana